I don’t get it, if Macdonell’s part in the trial is so insignificant he would never had been hired. Somehow I am positive that if his findings were what the prosecution wanted to hear his testimony would then have been the most significant testimony in this circus (oops! I mean trial). This case is just another horrid example of our countries deplorable treatment of all the brave men and women who put their lives in jeopardy to secure our safety and freedom. I am so ashamed.
DEFEND MICHAEL 
Plain and simple. Michael Behanna is innocent.
By: Virginia Syvinski on September 6, 2010
at 2:23 PM
I don’t get it, if Macdonell’s part in the trial is so insignificant he would never had been hired. Somehow I am positive that if his findings were what the prosecution wanted to hear his testimony would then have been the most significant testimony in this circus (oops! I mean trial). This case is just another horrid example of our countries deplorable treatment of all the brave men and women who put their lives in jeopardy to secure our safety and freedom. I am so ashamed.
By: Chelleincal on August 29, 2010
at 2:03 AM
[…] The Testimony The Prosecutors Didn’t Let The Jury Hear (From Their Own Expert Witness) […]
By: Here is another example of a miscarriage of justice on the part of our government… | Skip's Place on May 2, 2010
at 11:43 AM